Screen Reader Mode Icon
With this poll, we want to find out how the competition community feels about DG COMP's enforcement and policy priorities for the next EU Commission mandate. If you feel like helping us, please complete the questionnaire by 25 May. Don't worry, the survey is completely anonymous. And because we realize how precious your time is, we made sure this survey will only take a quick 600 seconds to complete. Note also that you can skip questions, and in particular the more open ended ones (or just write NFO for "no firm opinion"). When questions are open ended, please do not hesitate to use keywords instead of sentences in your replies. The replies to the survey will be used by the GCLC for research purposes ONLY. A first exposition of the survey results will be presented at our next lunch talk on 27 May.

Question Title

* 1. Please list the three priority themes for enforcement in antitrust policy

Question Title

* 2. Please list the three priority themes for enforcement in merger control

Question Title

* 3. Please list the three priority themes for State aid

Question Title

* 4. Which area(s) require a change of legislation or guidelines?

Question Title

* 5. What industries, sectors and practices should be priority targets for DG COMP?

Question Title

* 6. What should be the allocation of tasks between the European Commission and NCAs?

Question Title

* 7. What (if any) should be the objectives beyond consumer welfare?

Question Title

* 8. Should the Commission use Findings of Inapplicability (Article 10 Regulation 1/2003) or Guidance Letters to provide more legal certainty to public interests beyond strict antitrust objectives (eg, for sustainability-focused agreements)?

Question Title

* 9. Do you support a strictly delineated institutional right of evocation by the Council for mergers in sectors declared to have industrial policy importance?

Question Title

* 10. Do you support a longer time horizon of 5-7 years for counterfactual assessment under the EUMR?

Question Title

* 11. Should there be more emphasis on potential competition under the EUMR?

Question Title

* 12. Should the merger guidelines framework be reformed to ease the formulation of effective efficiency defenses by notifying parties?

Question Title

* 13. Should DG COMP use less 'lack of EU interest' reasoning in dismissing complaints?

Question Title

* 14. Should DG COMP be subject to more stringent deadlines to determine whether to dismiss a complaint?

Question Title

* 15. Are you satisfied with the publicity around enforcement activities? How to improve it?

Question Title

* 16. Review panels: should we use them more, publicly, in what cases?

Question Title

* 17. Non discretionary and publicized deadlines in antitrust cases

Question Title

* 18. How to increase the role of national courts in European competition enforcement beyond antitrust damages litigation?

Question Title

* 19. Have we reached the end of cartel enforcement in Europe?

Question Title

* 20. Is it that we have less cartels or that our tools need revisiting?

Question Title

* 21. Is the system of data and information gathering (eg, RFIs) going too far in imposing disproportionate burdens to companies?

Question Title

* 22. Please finish the sentence: "In contemporary enforcement, the CET is mostly discharging a

Question Title

* 23. Should mergers with foreign companies be subject to additional substantive or procedural scrutiny?

Question Title

* 24. Should there be an additional value based (transaction) jurisdictional treshold in the EUMR

Question Title

* 25. Which suggestions of the Report "Competition Policy for the Digital Era" (Cremer, de Montjoye and Schweitzer) do you mostly agree with (rank by decreasing order of preference)?

Question Title

* 26. Are deterrence-spirited tools like fines the response for new or not so new theories of harm in the digital markets?

Question Title

* 27. In State aid, should the system of remedies be further amended?

Question Title

* 28. Should we reconsider the position of third parties in State aid proceedings?

Question Title

* 29. Should state aid enforcement more prominently support industrial policy in the EU?

Question Title

* 30. State aid modernisation led to less ex ante enforcement (5% notifications nowadays) and more ex post monitoring (GBER, de minimis v notifications and decisions)

Question Title

* 31. State aid: Tax rulings

Question Title

* 32. State aid & damages actions: why not emulate antitrust damages? Would a directive make sense?

Question Title

* 33. How to prevent members of national parliaments from voting illegal State measures constituting aid?

0 sur 33
 

T